Skip to main content

How to Research Someone Before a Coffee Chat

Matthew Farquhar
Jun 11, 2026
Share:

Researching someone before a coffee chat means doing due diligence on the person, not the firm. The test: if you swapped their name for someone else's, your questions should fall apart. You map their LinkedIn into chapters, dig into their group, city, and background, and write 5 to 10 questions only they could answer.

When I was recruiting, I brought two laptops to school with me every day. To most people that looked like overkill, and honestly, they weren't wrong. But to me it was simply doing my due diligence. Before every chat I wanted every detail about the person I was speaking to right there at my fingertips, no Alt+Tabbing required, so I could speak to them as an individual rather than as a job title.

That is the whole idea behind researching someone before a coffee chat: you are doing due diligence on a human being. You wouldn't pitch an investment without understanding the asset. You shouldn't walk into a conversation with a banker without understanding the banker.

This article is about how to get there. Not the full pre-chat ritual of documents and dashboards, that's a separate piece, but the narrower, higher-leverage skill of investigating one specific person so thoroughly that your small talk, your questions, and even your introduction could only have been written for them.

Why You Research the Person, Not the Role

Most students prepare for the firm. They read about the bank, memorize a few recent deals, maybe skim the league tables, and walk in armed with facts that any of the other hundred students reaching out that month could also recite. That preparation isn't worthless, but it doesn't separate you, because it isn't yours. It's generic by design.

There's a reason this works. To a senior banker, a student is nowhere near an asset, so they often do nothing more than answer your questions curtly. The thing that changes that dynamic is rapport, and rapport is built on specificity. You cannot build rapport with someone you've treated as interchangeable. The name-swap test is your guardrail against exactly that.

Start With Their LinkedIn

Almost everything you need begins on one page: their LinkedIn profile. But don't read it the way most people do, scanning for a job title and a school name. Read it as a timeline. Read it as a story with chapters.

When someone introduces themselves, their background tends to fall into a handful of natural chapters, and you can map most of these straight off their profile before the chat even starts:

  • Pre-college — often a sport or an activity they did at a high level. This is rapport gold and almost nobody digs for it.
  • College — the finance catalyst, the clubs they joined, their recruitment story, their internships.
  • Post-college — the full-time analyst years, the "figuring it out" phase, how they landed at their current firm.
  • Their 20s (for more senior bankers) — switching careers, a notable professional accomplishment, moving cities or countries.

Mapping these chapters does two things. First, it tells you what's actually interesting and unique about this person, which is where your personalized questions will come from. Second, it gives you the implicit chronology you'll want to follow once you're in the conversation, so your questions feel organized rather than scattered. The person probably won't be able to tell you're following a structure. What they will feel is the absence of confusion, and that clarity rubs off on how they perceive you.

Read the profile closely enough and the "chapters" practically hand you your material. A two-year stint at a boutique before a move to a larger shop is a chapter. A pivot from equity research into banking is a chapter. A college spent rowing at a varsity level is a chapter. Each one is a door you can knock on later.

What to Actually Research

Once you've read their LinkedIn and mapped their timeline, you go digging. There are four buckets worth your time, and the first two flow directly out of what their profile told you.

Their Coverage or Product Group

This is the richest vein. Depending on what they'd disclosed on LinkedIn, I'd do research on market trends and M&A activity relating to their coverage or product group. If they're in Technology, I want to know what's happening in tech M&A right now. If they're in Energy, I'm reading up on the sector's recent deal activity and where valuations are moving.

The point isn't to memorize headlines so you can recite them. It's to understand their world well enough that, when they mention a deal or a trend, you can respond intelligently instead of just nodding. Your questions become anchored in the reality of their job, not in a generic notion of "investment banking."

Their City

This one is underrated and easy. I'd search for any notable headlines in the cities the people I spoke with were from, namely Los Angeles, Chicago, New York City, and San Francisco. A local headline is a perfect, low-stakes small-talk hook. It signals you paid attention to where they actually are, and it gives the opening minutes of the chat somewhere natural to go.

Their Personal Interests and Background

This is where the chapters pay off. An activity they played in high school, a club they led in college, a cause they're involved in. These are the rapport hooks that most students walk straight past. You're not researching these to interrogate someone about their hobbies. You're researching them so that, if the moment arises, you have something genuine to connect on. People like talking about themselves, and the more you let them, the more they'll like you.

News to Seed Your Small Talk

I'd keep a few news articles handy. In my case it was Bain's annual Private Equity Report, and I'd use those to inform the small talk I'd have at the beginning of every coffee chat. The article was a starting point, not a script. It gave me something current and credible to open with, tuned to the kind of person I was about to speak with.

Notice how all four buckets feed each other. Their LinkedIn tells you their group; their group tells you which market trends to read; their city tells you which headlines to check; their chapters tell you which interests to look for. The research isn't four separate chores. It's one investigation with the person at the center.

Turn Your Research Into 5–10 Personalized Questions

Research is only useful if it becomes something you can say. The deliverable is a short list of questions built specifically around this person.

Before every chat, spend time researching the industries, asset classes, markets, firms, or geographies relevant to the professional after looking through their LinkedIn profile, and then write your questions down.

Create at least 5 questions specific to this person (i.e., if we replaced this person's name with someone else's the question would no longer make sense).

That parenthetical is the whole game. Read each question you've written and run the name-swap test on it. If it survives being pointed at a stranger, cut it or sharpen it until it doesn't.

Let me show you what the pipeline looks like end to end, with a hypothetical banker so you can see the moving parts.

The research: Suppose I'm chatting with an analyst in the Industrials group at a bank's Chicago office. Her LinkedIn shows two years at a boutique before she lateraled to her current firm, and a college spent rowing on the varsity team. So I read up on recent industrials M&A and where deal activity in the sector has been heading. I check the Chicago headlines from the past week. And I note the boutique-to-larger-firm move and the rowing background as personal chapters.
The question it produces: "I saw you spent your first couple of years at a boutique before moving over to your current group, and I imagine the Industrials deal flow looks pretty different at the two. From the work I've been reading about where industrials M&A has been heading recently, I'd have guessed the move gave you a wider range of deals to work on, but I'd love to hear how the day-to-day actually changed for you, and whether the boutique experience prepared you for it the way you expected."

Now run the test. Swap her out for an analyst in a different group at a different firm with a different path, and the question falls apart. It only works for her. That's a researched question.

A few expectations to set. The first time you do this, plan for it to take a while. I spent about 30 minutes preparing for the first couple of chats of my penultimate recruitment cycle, and that was already after doing 100+ coffee chats in the past 6 months. By the end of the cycle I had that down to about 5 minutes. The speed comes with reps, the same way crafting questions and responses on the spot does. It's a skill, and it compounds.

The second expectation is counterintuitive: prepare 5 to 10 of these, and expect to ask only 1 or 2. Most of the conversation will go where the other person takes it, which is exactly what you want, because making them feel heard matters more than getting through your list. The questions you don't ask are not wasted. The act of building them forces you to understand the person, and that understanding is what powers your responses in real time. Plenty of students have built entire interview industry pitches out of nothing more than their pre-chat research. As tedious as it feels, this work pays off long after the chat ends.

The Payoff: Research You Surface Live

Here's where all of it comes together. I'd keep their LinkedIn open during the chat, not staring at it, but glancing at it periodically, especially as they answered my questions, to see if I could pick anything out from their background that connected to what I was about to say. Pulling a detail from someone's history into the live conversation at exactly the right moment is the move.

You cannot do this if you walked in cold. The whole reason you can connect a thing they just said to a thing on their profile is that you did the research beforehand. The live moment is just the research cashing in.

Where to Go From Here

Researching the person is one slice of the larger machine. A few natural next steps:

For the full pre-chat setup, the document dashboard, the screen arrangement, the notetaker, and how to actually deliver your small talk once you've got the material, see How to Prepare for an Investment Banking Coffee Chat.

The same "research the person, not the role" principle is what powers a great cold email, and it's arguably even more important before outreach than before the chat itself. For how to investigate someone well enough that they reply to a stranger, see How to Cold Email a Banker for a Coffee Chat.

And for ready-to-send follow-up and outreach templates, see the Email Networking Course.

Do the due diligence. Most students won't, and that gap is exactly where your edge lives.

Enjoyed this article?

Click on a star to rate it.

Common questions

Quick answers to the questions readers ask most often about this topic.

Budget around 30 minutes per person when you're starting out, and expect that to fall to roughly 5 minutes as you build the skill. The first few are slow because you're learning where to look and how to convert what you find into questions. Speed is a byproduct of reps, not shortcuts.

For context, it took me about 30 minutes to prep my first chats of a cycle, and that was already after 100+ coffee chats over six prior months. By the end of that cycle I was down to roughly 5 minutes per person. If you're spending 30 minutes on your fiftieth chat, that's fine. If you're spending it on your fifth, that's expected. The goal isn't to research faster for its own sake; it's to internalize the pattern so the prep stops feeling like a chore and starts feeling automatic.

Start with their LinkedIn profile, which is your single richest source. Read it as a timeline and map the chapters of their career: their pre-college activities, their college clubs and internships, their full-time path, and where they sit now. From there, branch into their coverage group's market trends, recent M&A in their sector, and notable headlines in their city.

LinkedIn anchors everything because it tells you which threads are worth pulling. If their profile shows they're in the Technology group, that's your cue to read tech M&A news. If they're based in Los Angeles, Chicago, New York City, or San Francisco, a recent local headline becomes an easy small-talk opener. A few current news pieces help too; I kept Bain's annual Private Equity Report handy as a small-talk seed. You're not collecting facts at random. You're letting the person's own background dictate where you dig.

Work with what's there and lean harder on the buckets that don't depend on personal detail. Even a sparse profile usually tells you their group and their city, and that alone unlocks coverage-sector research and local headlines. Build your personalized questions around their role and location rather than their hobbies.

A thin profile is more common than you'd think, especially with junior analysts who haven't filled theirs out. When the personal chapters aren't visible, you don't invent them, you pivot. A question about how deal flow in their specific group has been trending still passes the name-swap test, because it's anchored to their coverage. You lose the rapport-on-hobbies angle, but you keep the credibility angle. And remember, some of your best personal material will surface live during the chat itself, so keep their profile open and listen for chapters they mention out loud.

Prepare 5 to 10 questions specific to the person, and expect to actually ask only 1 or 2 of them. The gap is intentional. Most of the conversation will follow the direction the other person takes it, and that's a good thing, because making them feel heard matters more than getting through your list.

This trips people up: if you're only going to ask one or two, why write ten? Because the value of the exercise isn't just the questions you ask, it's the understanding you build by writing them. That understanding is what lets you respond intelligently when the conversation wanders somewhere you didn't script. Students have built entire interview industry pitches out of their pre-chat research alone. The prepared questions are the visible output; the real product is that you now genuinely understand the person and their corner of the market.

Run the name-swap test on every question you've written. Swap the person's name for a stranger's and reread the question. If it still makes sense, the question is generic and your research hasn't done its job. If it falls apart, you've built something that could only be aimed at this specific person, which is exactly the target.

This one test does more work than any checklist. A question like "what's the culture like at your firm?" survives the swap, so it fails the test. A question that references their specific group, their career move, and a sector trend relevant to their coverage collapses the moment you point it elsewhere, so it passes. The test is harsh on purpose, because the whole point of research is specificity. If you can't make a question person-specific, either dig deeper or cut it.

That's the normal case, not a failure, and it's why you prepare 5 to 10 questions instead of one. The conversation strays from your script in roughly 90% of chats. When it does, you follow the person's lead, ask one or two genuine follow-ups on their tangent, and then gently steer back. The research still pays off because it gave you the fluency to keep up.

Even questions you never ask earn their keep. The reading you did on their sector and their background is what lets you summarize their points accurately and connect them to what you already know, which is what makes you sound like a colleague rather than an interviewer. So if you walk in prepped on industrials M&A and they spend twenty minutes on their recruiting journey instead, you haven't wasted the prep. You've got the depth to engage with whatever comes, and your unused questions are there as a safety net if the conversation ever stalls.

No, as long as you surface details that the person chose to make public and you do it naturally rather than reciting a dossier. Mentioning a club they led or a sport listed on their profile reads as genuine interest, which is how rapport gets built. The line you don't cross is digging into things they didn't put out there themselves.

The skill is in the delivery. You don't open with "I see you rowed in college." You wait for a natural opening, often something they say live, and then connect to it: a shared interest, a thoughtful question about a chapter of their path. I'd keep someone's LinkedIn open during the chat specifically to catch these moments, glancing at it as they spoke to find a thread worth pulling. Done right, it doesn't feel like surveillance. It feels like you actually paid attention, which is the rarest and most valuable signal you can send.

Coffee Chat Etiquette for IB Recruiting

You're asking a busy banker for a favor they don't owe you. Carry yourself like a respectful guest: humble, warm without being stiff, careful with their time, and persistent in a way that reads as diligence — including the follow-up line that shrinks the ask to 5–10 minutes.

Continue Reading

When a Coffee Chat Becomes an Interview

Three of my hundreds of coffee chats quietly turned into interviews: LBO questions at UBS, resume deals at BofA and KKR. How to recognize an evaluative chat, why a technical question is a compliment, and what to keep open before every call.

Continue Reading

Investment Banking Behavioral Interview Cheat Sheet

The whole behavioral round on one card: the four things interviewers score, the four question types and how long each answer should run, the rules every answer follows, and the realistic ~5-question mix — including the Core 3 that open almost every interview.

Continue Reading

How to Structure an Investment Banking Resume

One principle governs the whole page: a resume unfolds from general to specific. The standard section stack, the two levers most students never pull — order by relevance, merge Professional & Extracurricular — and how to layer one entry from context down to named deals.

Continue Reading

How to Email a Senior Banker or MD

Reaching an MD isn't a copywriting problem, it's a hierarchy problem. Their reflex is to forward you down to an analyst. The fix: name the juniors you've already spoken to and ask for the view from the top — the one move that survives the hand-off.

Continue Reading

Stock Pitch Examples for Equity Research Interviews

An ER interviewer asks for two to four pitches and grades them like a hiring analyst. Worked here through one hypothetical med-device long, target $32 vs $22, with the mix-shift margin thesis run start to finish, plus the follow-up gauntlet they put every claim through.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to

Our Newsletter

Join a growing community of more than 500 readers.

I share actionable recruiting strategies, advice and tips directly to your inbox. It's free, and always will be.

We will never spam or sell your info. Ever.

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free coffee chat

Capstack OS

Our flagship recruiting course — the full system that takes you from non-target to offer.

Resources

Free templates, checklists, and the exact scripts we use — ready to download.

Workshops

Live sessions on the most important parts of recruiting: networking, interviews, and more.